So there's thing guy who has been chatting to me for a few days.
I've decided that it's time I find out the collective way that men think even though 'project me' is about doing it my way anyway.
Anyway, back to the guy.
Clearly he found me on an online dating site and it began with him saying that he was looking for his soul mate and the one. Petty soon we were chatting and he was totally fascinated by me. Our first night of chatting was awesome and chilled and so was our second one. The third one then began to get all sexual and the more I tried to bring it back to the getting to know you stuff the more he pushed. When he asked about cam I said I don't do it and he said good night.
I did give him my number and he used it to sms today to tell me that he has this dark side and although he wants to run there is a part of him that wants to stay. I answered in true style and said there was no need to run because I wasn't chasing. He then vanished for the rest of the day.
So after I had decided that he was gone for good ... he came online ... on the cheesy site and not on the more socially acceptable chat ... but anyway.
There are all the 'baby' and 'angel' and more 'baby' names callings in between reminding me how?intrigued?he is by me. Yet no matter what I talk about he drags the conversation back to sex.
I talk romance, he talks sex! I talk about the fun things I like to do and he talks ?... sex!
He says he's taking his time to get to know me and he's sitting with my number and only sms'd me!
The other side of the coin is that 'project me' is about having fun and maintaining the innocence ... I'm trying ... I really am!
Crazy ... but I like getting to know him and I know that a lot of my blogging is about reminding everyone to enjoy the experience more than the outcome ... but it's eating away at my innocence a little too much ....
If he only wants to know my erotic thoughts to get to know me could he also be just as genuine about saying he wants to take it slow because he really feels a connection and knows I'm different?